| 
         Number
        40: February 18, 2004 
 If you think your friends and colleagues would enjoy this newsletter
        feel free to forward it to them. If  someone
 sent this to you,  
 
 today. Outlook 2003 and AOL 9 users, please add us to your trusted or buddy lists, so you won't miss an issue. This week in Katydid:Screeching
        to Your AudienceThey are very disturbing. They spoil my appetite. My wife can't stand to
        look at them. My children love them. They laugh like crazy whenever
        they're on TV  and they love that we hate them. They're spongemonkeys,
        the lead characters in the new ads for Quizno's
        subs, a strange amalgam of marsupials (mice? no one knows) and bad
        dental work that would make Picasso say, "Whaaa?"
 The reaction to the campaign by the Martin
        Agency of Richmond goes two directions dividing evenly along a
        'certain age' line. You either hate it or love it, but there's no way
        you can ignore it. So, it grabs your attention but does it work? Is it good branding to
        have your food represented by the kind of creatures you're afraid
        scamper along the floorboards? Quizno's is in second place in the sandwich category behind Subway.
        They want to appeal to young men of high school and college age who are
        the most loyal consumers. Last year, they tried the edgy approach with a
        series of spots featuring a man raised by wolves. Unfortunately for
        them, nearly every agency seemed to have had the same idea and the
        content failed to connect with the audience. The "We Love the Subs!" campaign, starring the
        spongemonkeys is far edgier and as for humor, it probably has its
        strongest appeal to consumers of unregulated herbal combustibles;
        however, it's meant to go over our head and it's a good example of
        courage in advertising. Like hearing your father trying to use '-izzle' in a sentence, when
        commercials try to 'reach the youngsters' they seem awkward and ring
        false. They have no credibility (street cred, dogs  just keepin' it
        real). The young consumer is hyper-aware of advertising. They're conscious
        of their coveted status and they are unforgiving of posers. The content
        of the Quizno's commercials is very straightforward. There's no hype,
        just information  toasty, tasty subs. You get the beauty shots of the
        food behind the dancing spongemonkeys. It's as if Quizno's doesn't even
        care if they turn your stomach. However, before everyone goes out and creates a series of disgusting
        ads for their products, you should be aware that the credibility doesn't
        stem from the weirdness alone. It comes from the web counterculture. The original
        spongemonkeys are the creation of UK web artist, Joel Vietch, who
        has a huge underground following. His personal
        web site  in reality, a blog  contains a number of characters of
        that same unstructured, low-tech animation style made possible by
        PhotoShop and Flash. Be forewarned, if you find the commercials
        humorless, his other videos will likely be crude and offensive. For tamer fare, he has done commercials
        for Switch/Maestro
        debit cards. You can see his punk kittens and angry
        kittens performing versions of songs like "Welcome to the
        Jungle" and "Atomic Dog" on bumpers between programming
        on MTV. This kind of low-budget, cutout animation coupled with underground,
        viral distribution made South
        Park into a popular phenomenon. The style has huge credibility with
        young men precisely because none of the rest of us is even aware of it. Furthermore, the style is part of the undesign movement, where
        aesthetic design is secondary to content. Two philosophies drive this
        movement. From the practical side are the usability and human factor
        gurus like Jakob Nielson and Jason
        Kottke. Blogs
        are the best example of this philosophy because they're all about
        content and care little about appearance. From the artistic side, you have web artists (Vietch and his
        contemporaries) on sites such as b3ta.
        In an age where technology allows almost anyone to look polished and
        professional, one way to demonstrate creativity is have the courage to
        be impulsive, reckless, crude, and ugly. An interview
        on that site quotes Vietch: 
          "My mission is to destroy production values through swamping
          the online world with badly-polished graphics." In film, you have the Dogme
        95 movement, which eschews artifice by asking directors to take a
        "Vow of Chastity." They agree to shoot only on location
        instead of sets, using natural instead of artificial light, and
        hand-held cameras instead of employing dollies and cranes. Much like Pop Artists such as  Andy Warhol
        and Roy
        Lichtenstein made us hyper-aware of
        consumer culture, the undesign movement makes us examine the plastic
        veneer of perfection that has become part of our cultural aesthetic. The commercials work and I'm frankly surprised that the campaign got
        through the corporate approval process. I don't know if Quizno's or its
        consumers are aware of the irony of using the anti-corporate aesthetic
        to sell sandwiches. Since Joel works with prestigious agencies like cdp-travissully
        and the Martin Agency, I'm betting he's laughing all the way to the
        bank. The kids buying the sandwiches are surely unaware of the long history
        of each generation tearing down the conventions of the previous in order
        to build a new identity. Maybe they should all go rent The
        Graduate. If the wheel keeps turning, I'll bet the future will
        be plastics. Top » Thanks for ReadingThis e-mail newsletter spreads mainly by word of
        mouth. Please send it on to your colleagues. Also, you can
        read other back issues.
 If you have suggestions of web sites to review, writing that buzzes,
        or a new way of looking at things, let me know. Send your suggestions to
        
. If you received this newsletter from a friend, please 
        today. Our subscriber lists are confidential; we never sell or rent our
        lists to third parties. If you want to 
from this newsletter,
        please let us know. Kind regards, Kevin Troy Darling
 Top » |