| 
         Number
        55: June 2, 2004 
 If you think your friends and colleagues would enjoy this newsletter
        feel free to forward it to them. If  someone
 sent this to you,  
 
 today. Outlook 2003 and AOL 9 users, please add us to your trusted or buddy lists, so you won't miss an issue. This week in Katydid:Are
        We Killing E-mail?In March, the Pew
        Internet & American Life Project published a Data
        Memo on unsolicited e-mail (PDF). Among other things, the memo
        states that 29 percent of the people polled are using e-mail less
        because of unsolicited e-mail, which is an increase of 5 percent since
        last June.
 Despite legislation to prevent it, the problem has become worse. A
        May 20 article
        from eWeek quotes Shinya Akamine, President and CEO of Postini,
        Inc. that the volume of unsolicited e-mail has risen from 78 percent
        to to 83 percent of e-mail since congress enacted legislation banning it
        in January. Some companies have cut back on direct marketing through e-mail and
        returned to snail mail. Mike Gilbert, President of Three
        a.m. Advertising, declared in an
        article in the Puget Sound Business Journal that they
        recommend their clients switch to direct mail: 
          "You can have the best brand in the world and if you send out
          a mass e-mail, the best thing that can happen is it's deleted,"
          Gilbert said. "The worst thing is that the brand is denigrated
          because it's associated with spam." I don't agree with the conclusion that e-mail is dead and it should
        be abandoned but certainly, it is applied improperly. Direct response
        marketing through e-mail is cheap and much of the abuse stems from that
        fact. Most methods proposed to solve the problem add some element of
        cost into the equation. Ideas range from postage at fractions of a penny
        to bonded systems costing thousands of dollars. The abusers have given us high hopes for sales through e-mail and too
        many marketers adopted their content and art direction. However, the
        secret to their success is essentially extended reach. They didn't have
        to do market research to find their target; they just had to contact
        everybody. It's as if they could fish by casting their nets over the
        entire Pacific Ocean, catch only whales, and merely annoy all the other
        fish. Responsible marketers have struggled to find reliable, targeted
        lists. The data tends to be old and the turnover high. But tracking is
        good and we can develop our own house lists, which are superior. E-mail
        is still effective if you can get someone to open it and that's where
        the volume of unsolicited e-mail has created the greatest obstacle. Our behavior has changed. Sure, we have many filters  our ISP, our
        mail server, our mail clients, and a wide range of third-party products
         but we have trained ourselves to be masterful filters. We delete large
        blocks of e-mail in just seconds because we fail to recognize the name
        or because the subject line looks suspicious. We also have turned off
        our preview windows. The e-mail abusers make it easy by using our names in unusual ways
        and by including strange symbols or obscure words in the subject line.
        Frankly, it's easy to identify the junk because it looks untrustworthy. Trust is the central concern. According to the Pew Memo, "63% of
        email users said that the influx of spam made them less trusting of
        email in general." Your competitive advantage over unsolicited
        e-mail is that you can appear trustworthy. You can use a recognizable
        name. You can create a meaningful subject line. Moreover, you can get
        your recipient to look for your e-mail. E-mail is a very poor awareness tool. It still has limited reach and
        the container has very low creative potential. The subject line is the
        only place for messaging. You can't count on anyone looking inside, so
        the subject line has to sell the entire deal. Even there you have to
        limit yourself to thirty or forty characters. Take it from me, if you
        could boil the entire campaign down to a few words (and you should try),
        you wouldn't need any content or creative at all  just the URL. The best use of e-mail is to extend or transform an existing
        relationship. That is the most cost-effective use of your budget.
        Though, it has to be part of a coordinated strategy. Use traditional
        campaigns to create awareness and drive people to your web site. Use the
        web site to develop the relationship and then offer e-mail as a means of
        continuing the relationship. Better still, use e-mail to turn your existing relationships into
        recruiters of new relationships. Using the permission-based marketing
        approach, give your established relationships reasons to recommend you
        and the tools to do so. Additionally, one of the reasons that direct mail is making a
        comeback of sorts is that it shows your level of commitment to earning
        their business. I like to say that every customer touchpoint should be a
        gift. You can do this in many creative ways. Even the act of turning
        over a postcard can be a gift if there's a pleasant surprise on the
        other side. Great design and engaging content also show your willingness to
        invest in their relationship. (It's a courtship after all.) Potential
        customers want to know you're willing to invest a little to gain their
        business. They also want to know you're a business stable enough to
        invest a little. That doesn't mean you should pander or bribe them
        because people take pleasure in getting something for nothing. However,
        your creative can look like more of an investment than it really is. So, are we killing e-mail? Well, if e-mail were a plant, we've been
        mistreating it by placing it in the wrong light, not feeding it enough,
        and expecting a bountiful harvest of fruit. And it's not even a
        fruit-bearing plant. It's more of a flower. Something you give to
        someone as a  symbol of your
        relationship, hoping to take things just a
        bit further. Top » Thanks for ReadingThis e-mail newsletter spreads mainly by word of
        mouth. Please send it on to your colleagues. Also, you can
        read other back issues.
 If you have suggestions of web sites to review, writing that buzzes,
        or a new way of looking at things, let me know. Send your suggestions to
        
. If you received this newsletter from a friend, please 
        today. Our subscriber lists are confidential; we never sell or rent our
        lists to third parties. If you want to 
from this newsletter,
        please let us know. Kind regards, Kevin Troy Darling
 Top » |